Welcome to the twenty-fourth match in this year’s Big Math-Off. Take a look at the two interesting bits of maths below, and vote for your favourite.
You can still submit pitches, and anyone can enter: instructions are in the announcement post.
Here are today’s two pitches.
James Tanton – Tie folding and a link to Artin’s conjecture
James Tanton is a prolific maths education thinker and the inventor of Exploding Dots. You can find him on Twitter at @JamesTanton where he regularly posts chin-scratching maths problems, or at jamestanton.com.
Who knew that such simple fun as folding a tie can connect with unsolved problems in number theory, and perhaps even provide some new insights?
Clare Wallace – A princess problem
Clare is a mathematician at Durham University. She tweets at @Clare_L_Wallace.
A few months ago, I was volun-told that it was my turn to present at the postgraduate seminar in Probability and Statistics at my university. Never one to miss an opportunity to gain a talk for my own (much less frequent) Pure Maths seminar series, I agreed on the condition of a joint talk between the two groups. Rather than trying to explain my research to two completely different groups of mathematicians, I set out to find some interesting, unintuitive probability questions I could ask my fellow grad students. The Sleeping Beauty Problem is one of them.
Here’s how it works.
Sleeping Beauty has signed up to be part of our psychology experiment. (No princesses were harmed in the making of this pitch!) She’s going to take a sleeping potion on Sunday night, and go and lie down. Then, the researchers will flip a coin. If it’s heads, they will do the Interview Procedure on both Monday and Tuesday; if it’s tails, they will only do it on Monday.
Interview Procedure:
- Wake up Sleeping Beauty
- Conduct an Interview
- Give her two potions to take: a forgetting potion, and a sleeping potion
The forgetting potion means that Sleeping Beauty will not remember whether or not she’s already been interviewed, but she won’t forget the rules of the experiment.
The question is this: Sleeping Beauty is in an Interview, and she’s asked: “From your perspective, what is the probability that the coin landed tails?”
Here it gets tricky.
The argument for 1/2
Heads and tails were equally likely to start with, and Sleeping Beauty hasn’t learned anything: she always knew she would wake up at some point in the process. She has no new information, so she should stick with what she’d have answered before the experiment:
\[ \mathbb{P}(\text{Tails}) = \frac{1}{2} \]
The argument for 1/3
This one is a bit more involved.
Firstly: If the coin landed heads, it’s equally likely, as far as Sleeping Beauty is concerned, that the interview is taking place on Monday or Tuesday.
So
\[ \mathbb{P}(\text{Monday} | \text{Heads}) = \mathbb{P}(\text{Tuesday} | \text{Heads}) \]
We can use a cheeky Bayes’ Theorem here:
\[ \frac{ \mathbb{P}(\text{Monday and Heads})}{\mathbb{P}(\text{Heads})} = \frac{\mathbb{P}(\text{Tuesday and Heads})}{\mathbb{P}(\text{Heads})} \]
On the other hand, learning that it’s Monday doesn’t tell us anything about the coin toss. So
\[ \mathbb{P}(\text{Tails} | \text{Monday}) = \mathbb{P}(\text{Heads} | \text{Monday}) \]
Our old friend Bayes makes a comeback:
[ \frac{ \mathbb{P}(\text{Monday and Tails})}{\mathbb{P}(\text{Monday})} = \frac{\mathbb{P}(\text{Monday and Heads})}{\mathbb{P}(\text{Monday})} ]
And now we’ve convinced ourselves that
\[ \mathbb{P}(\text{Monday and Tails}) = \mathbb{P}(\text{Monday and Heads}) = \mathbb{P}(\text{Tuesday and Heads}) \]
Three equally likely options; nothing else can happen. “Tails and Monday” is the same thing as “Tails”, so
\[ \mathbb{P}(\text{Tails}) = \frac{1}{3} \]
This problem caused a lot of trouble amongst the grad students! By the end of a week of lunchtime discussions, we were (almost) all convinced by the 1/3 argument. My friend Kieran Richards took it one step further, and found a way to switch the probabilities. This time, we roll a six-sided die, and wake up Sleeping Beauty twice if we roll 1, 2, or 3, and once if we roll 4, 5, or 6. In the Interview, Sleeping Beauty is told that the roll was even, and asked “From your perspective, what is the probability that the roll was at least a 4?” In this scenario, following the first argument gives you an answer of 1/3, and following the second gives you an answer of 1/2…
So, which bit of maths made you say “Aha!” the loudest? Vote:
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.The poll closes at 9am BST on Saturday the 30th, when the next match starts.
If you’ve been inspired to share your own bit of maths, look at the announcement post for how to send it in. The Big Lockdown Math-Off will keep running until we run out of pitches or we’re allowed outside again, whichever comes first.
from The Aperiodical https://ift.tt/3caKxpK
Post a Comment