IFRAME SYNC
IFRAME SYNC
IFRAME SYNC
IFRAME SYNC

Why do Bourbaki define the characteristic of a ring the way they do? https://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Here is the definition of the characteristic of a ring $R$ that is common in everyday usage (for example in Lang's Algebra and Wikipedia): take the unique homomorphism $$ \mathbb{Z} \to R $$ and define $\operatorname{char}(R)$ to be the smallest positive integer that generates the kernel of this map.

And yet on page A.V.2 of Bourbaki's Algebra II: Chapters 4 - 7 the characteristic is defined in a way that excludes rings without subrings which are fields. This leaves the ring of integers without a characteristic. While I can appreciate that $\mathbb{Z}$ is best considered as a mixed characteristic ring, what was the purpose of defining the characteristic like that?



from Hot Weekly Questions - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Jimmy R

Post a Comment

[blogger]

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

copyrighted to mathematicianadda.com. Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget

Blog Archive