I am a relatively novice student of mathematics and I'm wondering about the important of proofs in published research. There are many publications of mathematics that propose conjectures. I heard that for a paper to taken seriously every stated theorem must be proven, but is this not restrictive for things that aren't easily proven and can stunt mathematical growth in publication volume in some respects?
I haven't read much published research so forgive my ignorance.
[link] [comments]
from math https://ift.tt/3kKTNpX https://ift.tt/eA8V8J
Post a Comment